And the advantage is likely to grow as Apple releases even more efficient processors over the coming year and more app developers release M1 native versions of their apps.Īdobe has already updated other apps and features in the Creative Suite to run natively on the M1, including Lightroom and Camera RAW. This means that laptops equipped with Apple’s silicon offer an unquestionable advantage over competing machines for creative pros who use Adobe’s products frequently. Photoshop running in the Rosetta 2 emulation layer on M1 Macs is already competitive with the results from many Intel Core i5- and Core i7-powered laptops running Photoshop natively.
Mac photoshop software#
Still, even a 16% boost is impressive considering that improvements are limited to software tweaks alone. That’s double the improvement our test shows, though it’s not quite the 1.5x average that Adobe is claiming.
Mac photoshop mac#
Using a Mac mini running the Puget benchmark, PetaPixel demonstrated a 33% performance improvement. Like our test, the Puget benchmark includes image resizing and many blur effects, but it also adds the especially intense Content Aware Fill and Photo Merge tasks. One emerging benchmark is from Puget Systems, a small firm that builds PCs tailor-made to the complex workflows of digital artists. Other tests use alternate workflows that tax a computer’s resources in different ways. While our test uses many "classic" filters and effects that aren’t necessarily optimized to show off the capabilities of modern processors like the M1, we believe it’s representative of many real-world workflows. Gains Depend on the Benchmark Composition Here is the breakdown of how long our 10 test filters took on the new M1 version of the software (version 22.3), compared with how long it takes when we forced the same version to run in the Rosetta 2 emulation layer: These include resizing the image, applying Watercolor and Stained Glass effects, and using several types of blur filters. While the test has evolved slightly over the years, many of the operations haven’t changed much since Photoshop CS6 was released nearly a decade ago.
Mac photoshop series#
Our test involves timing how long it takes to apply a series of 10 filters and effects to a JPG image. Adobe notes that some of these operations “feel noticeably faster,” which will likely gratify photographers and other digital artists who use Photoshop all day long.Įvery artist uses Photoshop differently, of course, and so does every benchmark test. They include opening and running filters, and compute-heavy operations like Content-Aware Fill and Select Subject. Adobe’s claim of 50% better performance is based on average results from many different Photoshop activities performed during the company’s internal tests.
0 kommentar(er)
